Legal Opinion

Lee Tung v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1925No. 4488PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

The indictment in this ease contains two counts, but there was an acquittal under the first count, and we are only concerned with the second. The second count charges that the defendant did unlawfully, knowingly, feloniously, and fraudulently receive, conceal, buy, sell, and facilitate the transportation and concealment after importation of a certain derivative and preparation of opium, to wit, four cards and one jar of prepared smoking opium, containing an approximate total of 42 grains, which said prepared smoking opium, as the said defendant then and there well knew,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. William L. Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. James Boyd Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Rosenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  4. Forno v. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Perez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API