Legal Opinion
Perez v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1926No. 4707PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in ' error was indicted in two counts — one charging him with violation of the Act of December 17, 1914, as amended February 24, 1919 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 6287g, 6287l), in selling, dispensing, and distributing a package of morphine not then and there in nor from the original stamped package containing the same; the second charging him with violation of the Aet of February 9, 1909, as amended January 17, 1914, and May 26, 1922 (Comp. St. Supp. 1925, § 8800, 8801), in receiving, buying, selling, and facilitating the transportation of and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
- United States v. Wong SingSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Wong Lung Sing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Lee Tung v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chadwick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Stassi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Leon Barnes v. United States of America, George Childress v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.