Legal Opinion
Forno v. Coyle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 25, 1935No. 7384PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
The appellee has moved this court to ’dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment of the lower court, for the reason that this court has no jurisdiction to proceed herein, in that there is no showing that the value of the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000.
In his affidavit as to the value of the property in controversy, the appellant declared : “ * * * The area in conflict * * * constitutes 1.3 acres of the total area of 11.07 acres of my claim, the Poor-man Bench, 1st tier, * * * I have been mining my said claim continuously since 1927 and have sunk seven * * * shafts…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Red River Cattle Co. v. NeedhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Sulpho-Saline Bath Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Lee Tung v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Wilson v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- McDonough v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Hutchinson v. William C. Barry, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- Hammontree v. KenworthyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.