Legal Opinion

Cordero v. Potomac Insurance Co. of Illinois

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 2002PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the order issued by the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County rendering declaratory judgment in favor of Appellees Potomac Insurance Company of Illinois (Potomac Insurance), General Accident Insurance Company (General Accident), Javier Cordero, and Z & A Auto Sales (Z & A). The trial court declared that Appellees had no duty to pay to Appellants benefits under a Commercial Umbrella Insurance Policy, which was issued to Z & A by Potomac Insurance, a division of General Accident. On appeal, Appellants contend that Javier Cordero is an insured under…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lititz Mutual Insurance v. SteelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Globe Indemnity Co. v. JordanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Bowers v. Estate of FeathersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Robson v. EMC Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. CraleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Profit Wize Marketing v. WiestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Kropa v. Gateway FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PECOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Doucot v. IDS Scheer, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  5. Totty v. Chubb Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API