Bowers v. Estate of Feathers
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
The primary issue in these consolidated appeals is whether Paula Feathers was an insured and is entitled to coverage under a multiple coverage insurance policy issued by Universal Underwriters Insurance Company while driving a vehicle loaned to her by a dealer. Feathers was an insured and is entitled to coverage under the “garage” portion. However, she was not an insured under the “umbrella” portion, of the policy. Under the garage portion of the policy, moreover, Universal’s liability is limited by a valid “most we will pay” clause.
Paula Feathers’ car was in the Kelly Shuster…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Mamlin v. GenoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Blocker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Windsor Insurance Co. v. LucasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Cordero v. Potomac Insurance Co. of IllinoisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Nationwide Insurance v. Horace Mann InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Universal Underwriters Insurance v. HillCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.