Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Estate of Feathers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1995No. 1616, 1753 and 1754PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The primary issue in these consolidated appeals is whether Paula Feathers was an insured and is entitled to coverage under a multiple coverage insurance policy issued by Universal Underwriters Insurance Company while driving a vehicle loaned to her by a dealer. Feathers was an insured and is entitled to coverage under the “garage” portion. However, she was not an insured under the “umbrella” portion, of the policy. Under the garage portion of the policy, moreover, Universal’s liability is limited by a valid “most we will pay” clause.

Paula Feathers’ car was in the Kelly Shuster…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Mamlin v. GenoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Blocker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Windsor Insurance Co. v. LucasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Cordero v. Potomac Insurance Co. of IllinoisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Nationwide Insurance v. Horace Mann InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. HillCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API