Legal Opinion

Russ Berrie & Co., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 17, 2003No. SLIP OP. 03-122; Court 00-00018PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Senior Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion motion for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT R. 56. It involves the proper classification of earrings and pins portraying motifs associated with Christmas and Halloween. The case requires the Court to interpret the scope of the term “festive articles” as it appears in heading 9505 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States (“HTSUS”) and determine the relationship between Chapters 95 and 71 of the HTSUS.

For the reasons that follow, the Court finds…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Russ Berrie & Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  3. Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  4. Russ Berrie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API