Legal Opinion
Tuite v. Tuite
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 26, 1963PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment rendered by the Superior Court in favor of the plaintiff in an action of peaceable entry and forcible detainer brought under § 52-462 of the General Statutes. No finding was requested or made. Our inquiry, therefore, must be confined to error which appears on the face of the record. Practice Boole § 385; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proe., p. 155. The memorandum of decision cannot take the place of a finding. Gitlitz v. Davis, 146 Conn. 280, 281, 150 A.2d 213; Maltbie, op. cit., p. 188. We therefore examine the pleadings for such facts as they disclose.
It…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mendrochowicz v. WolfeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Orentlicherman v. MatareseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Gitlitz v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Lee v. StilesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Pepin v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Kyser v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Zachs v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Rogan v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.