Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. County of Westchester

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The County of Westchester as defendant in each of these actions moves to dismiss the complaints on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that each complaint fails to state a cause of action.

*860The actions are brought pursuant to the authority of section 71 of the General Municipal Law and seek damages for property alleged to have been destroyed by mob or riot. The motions are based upon the failure of plaintiffs in each action to have presented a claim as required by former section 6-a of the County Law in effect when the actions were commenced and section 50-e of the General Municipal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. SturgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Marshall v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Smith v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kamienska v. County of Westchester, New York County Courts1963
  2. Mr. Paint Shop, Inc. v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Canter v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
  4. Keesler v. City of Peekskill, New York County Courts1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API