Legal Opinion
Mr. Paint Shop, Inc. v. City of Rochester
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClarence H. Brisco, J.
There iare two motions before the court. The first motion is directed against the answer of the County of Monroe to dismiss the affirmative defense set forth *685in the answer of the County of Monroe. This affirmative defense is that any action against the county pursuant to section 71 of the General Municipal Law is barred by the provisions of the New York State Defense Emergency Act. (L. 1951, ch. 784, as amd.)
The second motion is directed against all the affirmative defenses interposed by the City of Rochester in its answer to the complaint. These affirmative defenses of the City of Rochester,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brown v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Orinoco Realty Co. v. . BandlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Buduson v. CurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Buduson v. CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Philip Bloom v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Canter v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968