Legal Opinion

Kamienska v. County of Westchester

New York County Courts

Decided June 15, 1963PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John H. Galloway, Jr., J.

One of the plaintiffs, Roger Marallo, moves under rules 113 and 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice for an order striking out the answer of the defendants as to his the fourth cause of action set forth in the complaint and directing summary judgment for said plaintiff thereon. The defendants cross-move under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for an order dismissing the complaint (including plaintiff Roger Marallo ?s cause of action) on the ground that ‘1 it fails to state a cause of action in that there ivas no timely service of a notice of claim and that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pierpoint v. HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Hofferman v. SimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Employers' Fire Insurance v. CottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Simpson v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Guild v. HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robert J. Fine v. The City of New York, Anthony SaladinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Boyle v. KelleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Smith v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Fine v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. Boyle v. KelleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API