Legal Opinion
State v. Horseman
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1993No. 92-491PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber
This is an appeal from the Twelfth Judicial District Court, Hill County, affirming a charge of possession of an unlawfully killed game animal in violation of § 87-3-111(1), MCA, against Ruben Horseman. We affirm.
We restate the issues on appeal:
1. Did the District Court err in determining that Ruben Horseman, an enrolled tribal member of the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation, had possession of an illegally killed bighorn sheep?
2. Did the District Court err in determining that it had jurisdiction to rule in Horseman’s case?
3. Did the District Court properly conclude that no evidence was presented…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Duro v. ReinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- BRENDALE v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife v. Klamath Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Robert Lee Weaselhead, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- State v. HaskinsMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. St. DennisMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. MedearisDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2002
- United States v. Robert Lee Weaselhead, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.