Legal Opinion

State v. Haskins

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1994No. 93-408PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

Appellant Thomas Haskins (Haskins) appeals from his November 27, 1989 conviction by a Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County jury of four counts of criminal sale of dangerous drugs. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The factual background and a portion of the procedural background of this case is set forth in State v. Haskins (1992), 255 Mont. 202, 841 P.2d 542, (Haskins I) and will not be repeated in any detail here except as necessary to address the issues raised. Suffice it to say that Haskins is a non-Indian; that the State criminal offenses of which he was convicted were committed entirely…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Solem v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. GregoroffMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. VanderslootMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. PamperienCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. State v. BergMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. DezeeuwMontana Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API