Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife v. Klamath Indian Tribe
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
In 1901 the Klamath Indian Tribe ceded 621,824 acres of reservation land to the United States. The question pre*755sented in this case is whether the Tribe thereafter retained a special right to hunt and fish on the ceded lands free of state regulation. In answering that question we consider not only the terms of the 1901 Cession Agreement but also the predecessor 1864 Treaty that established the Tribe’s original reservation and certain other events in the history of the Tribe.
I
In the early 19th century, the Klamath and Modoc Tribes and the Yahooskin Band of Snake Indians claimed aboriginal title…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. Tommy G. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Grey BearCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.