Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Horton
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1935No. Civ. 10194PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrail, J.
This is an appeal from a money judgment rendered against the defendants in their individual capacity for an indebtedness incurred on a contract entered into with the plaintiff’s assignors (hereafter called the plaintiffs) by the said defendants nominally as trustees of the Bell View Oil Syndicate, a common law or so-called Massachusetts trust. The trial court found that the contract was entered into on behalf of the defendants in their individual capacity, and it is the first contention of the defendants on appeal that “the evidence is contrary to and does not justify the judgment ’ ’.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Robson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Standard Oil Co. v. John P. Mills OrganizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Wells, Fargo & Co. v. EnrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Automobile Insurance v. WinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Inglis v. GarlandAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1936
- Zimmer Construction Co. v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Whitney v. City & County of San FraniscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.