Board of Education v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Levine, J.
In 1966, plaintiff, the Board of Education of the Hudson City School District (hereinafter the School District), entered into an agreement with defendant, Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley (hereinafter the Architect), on a standard form of agreement of the American Institute of Architects (hereinafter AIA) for the provision of plans and specifications and supervi*193sory architectural services in connection with the construction of a new high school building. Under paragraph 7 (b) of the agreement, the Architect was obligated to make periodic visits to the work…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Kenford Co. v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- McDermott v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- White v. GuarenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- 17 Vista Fee Associates v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- RKB Enterprises, Inc. v. Ernst & YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Menorah Nursing Home, Inc. v. ZukovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Facilities Development Corp. v. MilettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Abernathy-Thomas Engineering Co. v. Pall Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.