Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Whiting

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1985No. 83-1482PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

Initially, it should be noted that the only issues properly before this court are the following:(1) Whether the governmental defendants are protected from civil liability by the doctrine of judicial immunity?(2) Has the appellant set forth causes of action against the nongovernmental defendants based on the common-law torts of invasion of *93privacy or malicious prosecution, or based on Section 1983, Title 42, U.S. Code?1

Appellant’s Section 1983 claims against the governmental appellees were properly dismissed because these appellees were immune from the claims. In Stump v. Sparkman (1978), 435…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Sylvester Lockhart, Jr. v. Charles A. Hoenstine, Prothonotary of the Superior Court of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  3. Henderson v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Battig v. ForsheyOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Woodruff v. PaschenOhio Supreme Court · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Yaklevich v. Kemp, Schaeffer & Rowe Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Trussell v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Robb v. Chagrin Lagoons Yacht Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Crawford v. Euclid National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Deoma v. Shaker HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API