Crawford v. Euclid National Bank
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In the first paragraph of the syllabus in Bruck, supra, this court stated that “[a]s a general rule no suit will lie for the malicious prosecution of a civil action, where there has been no arrest of the person or seizure of property.”
The plaintiffs-appellants submit that one who has been required to deposit funds in an escrow account and accept a less favorable mortgage rate has sustained a sufficient seizure of property to establish a prima facie cause of action for malicious prosecution, assuming all other elements of the tort are also present. Appellants contend that the requirement that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Border City Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MoanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Kauffman v. AH Robins CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
- Kelly v. WhitingOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Avco Delta Corp. v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
- Woodruff v. PaschenOhio Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Yaklevich v. Kemp, Schaeffer & Rowe Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Trussell v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Hawley v. RitleyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Robb v. Chagrin Lagoons Yacht Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Uebelacker v. Cincom Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.