Legal Opinion
State v. Brobst
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 9, 2004No. 2003-503PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The State appeals the order of the Superior Court (Groff, J.) granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss a charge of harassment, see RSA 644:4, 1(a) (1996), because the court determined that the statute under which the defendant, Michael B. Brobst, was charged is unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of his rights under Part I, Article 22 of the New Hampshire Constitution and the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the Federal Constitution. We affirm.
The limited record reflects the following facts. On December 29, 2002, the defendant made a number of telephone calls to the house where the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. Munson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. MacElmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- United States v. Ho Ka YungCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- State v. HynesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. GubitosiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.