Legal Opinion
State v. Pierce
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 2, 2005No. 2004-491PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
The defendant, Derek Sean Pierce, appeals his conviction for harassment, RSA 644:4,1(f) (1996), in the Durham District Court (Larson, J.), on the grounds that the statute is unconstitutional. We reverse.
*791The record supports the following facts. In October 2003, Pierce was charged with the crime of harassment under RSA 644:4, 1(f) which provides:
I. A person is guilty of a misdemeanor, and subject to prosecution in the jurisdiction where the communication originated or was received, if such person:(f) With the purpose to annoy or alarm another, having been previously notified that the recipient…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- White v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. SmagulaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Pennelli v. Town of PelhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- John Farrelly v. City of Concord & ASupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. GubitosiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Tuttle v. New Hampshire Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- In re Alex C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.