Legal Opinion

Palasota v. Haggar Clothing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 3, 2003No. 02-10844PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue before us in this age discrimination in employment case is whether the district court erred in granting Judgment as a Matter of Law to Defendant, Haggar Clothing Co. (“Haggar”) after the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Jimmy Palasota (“Palasota”). Our review of the record convinces us that the district court did err. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the district court, reinstate the jury verdict in favor of Pala-sota and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Palasota was employed as a Sales Associate by Haggar for twenty-eight years.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Bodenheimer v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Russell v. McKinney Hosp. VentureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Rachid v. Jack In The Box IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Jackson v. Cal-Western Packaging Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  4. MacHinchick v. PB Power, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. Keelan v. Majesco Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API