Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
The petitioner applied for and was granted a writ of review herein upon its application therefor, wherein it sought to have reviewed and annulled a decision and award of the Industrial Accident Commission wherein it finally granted to one Pete Sertok, an employee, a disability award. The facts upon which the application of the petitioner is predicated are not disputed and may be briefly summarized as follows: Pete Sertok had been in the employ of the petitioner herein for a number of years prior to his illness and application for an award. In July, 1927, he became ill with a disorder which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Crowe Glass Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Kennedy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Hanson v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Young v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Western Pipe & Steel Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bakaloff v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930