Bailey v. Filco, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, J.
Plaintiff David C. Bailey (Bailey) was injured in an automobile accident with Carolyn Shinn (Shinn), an employee of defendant Pilco, Inc. (Pilco), a retail business engaged in the sale and rental of electronic goods and appliances. Bailey sued Pilco under a theory of respondeat superior. At the time of the accident, Shinn was on a paid break and was driving to obtain some cookies to eat back at work. The jury found that Shinn was not engaged within the scope of her employment at the time of the accident, and the court entered judgment for Pilco. On appeal Bailey contends that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ronald A. Baptist v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Cassady v. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Inter Mountain Mortgage, Inc. v. SulimenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Jorge v. Culinary Institute of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Depew v. Crocodile Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.