Jorge v. Culinary Institute of America
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, Acting P. J.—
Respondent Leopoldo Jorge, Jr. (Jorge), sued Almir Da Fonseca (Da Fonseca) and appellant Culinary Institute of America (Culinary Institute or Institute) for injuries sustained when he was struck by a car driven by Da Fonseca, a chef instructor employed by the Culinary Institute. Despite that Da Fonseca had finished his shift at the Culinary Institute and was driving home in his own car at the time of the accident, a jury found the Institute liable for Jorge’s injuries on a theory of respondeat superior. The Culinary Institute moved for judgment notwithstanding the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Kuhn v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Burch v. Certainteed Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Newland v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Morales-Simental v. Genentech, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.