Legal Opinion

United States v. Greenhut

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 11, 1892PublishedCited by 18 opinions

At Law. Indictment against Joseph B. Greenhut and others for violating the law against monopolies. Heard on application for a warrant to remove defendants to another district for trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Ricks, District Judge.

This cause comes before me upon the application by the district attorney for a warrant for removal to the district of Massachusetts of Warren Corning and Julius French, citizens of this judicial district, against whom is pending an indictment preferred by the United States in the district court for the district of Massachusetts. A certified copy of the indictment, together with the return of A. J. Williams, a United States commissioner for the circuit court of this district, that said defendants refused to give bail, and were by him committed, is tiled. The defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BuellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1875

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. United States v. MacAndrews & Forbes Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906
  3. State v. CoyleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Matter of Application of ShoemakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Ex Parte ShowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API