Legal Opinion
Rolland v. Cellucci
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 27, 2001No. CIV. A. 98-30208-KPNPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FURTHER RELIEF CONCERNING SPECIALIZED SERVICES (Docket No. 159)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the court is Plaintiffs’ motion for further relief concerning specialized services. The motion asks the court to do three things: (1) find that Defendants have not been substantially complying with portions of the parties’ settlement agreement which governs specialized services, (2) lift the stay imposed by the settlement agreement with respect to specialized services, and (3) order Defendants to take certain remedial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Project B.A.S.I.C. v. KempCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Jane Fortin, Etc. v. Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Accusoft Corporation, Appellant\cross-Appellee v. James L. Palo Simon Weiczner Individually and D/B/A Snowbound Software, Appellees\cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Carlos Morales-Feliciano v. Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rolland v. RomneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Bates v. Department of Behavioral & Developmental ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Rolland v. CellucciDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Rolland v. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Rolland v. CellucciDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.