Legal Opinion
Rolland v. Cellucci
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 3, 2002No. Civ.A.98-30208-KPNPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD. TO PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR FURTHER RELIEF CONCERNING SPECIALIZED SERVICES (Docket No. 213)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the court is Plaintiffs’ amended motion for further relief concerning specialized services. Plaintiffs comprise a class of developmentally disabled and mentally retarded individuals in Massachusetts nursing homes. Their motion arises directly from this court’s March 27, 2001 finding, that Defendants, various state officials, had failed to substantially comply with that part of the parties’ settlement…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kate Frazier v. Fairhaven School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rolland v. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Rolland v. PatrickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Rolland v. RomneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Rolland v. PatrickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Rolland v. PatrickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013