Legal Opinion

Falconer v. Adams

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2001No. S-9290PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Charlie Falconer sued Karia Taylor Welch and Donald Adams because of a motor vehicle accident. Falconer obtained a verdict against Taylor-Welch, but Adams was exonerated and was awarded attorney's fees and costs. The question before us is whether Adams or Falconer's attorney who has a lien on Falconer's judgment against Taylor-Welch is entitled to the judgment proceeds. We conclude that because Adams is not a party to Faleoner's judgment against Taylor-Welch, the attorney's lien has priority.

II, FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On February 3, 1992, Karla…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Beecher v. Peter A. Vogt Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Alexander v. ClarksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Phillips v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Williams v. Utility Equipment, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kenneth M. Duffus v. Lee E. Baker, Jr. , Lee E. Baker, Jr. v. Kenneth M. DuffusAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  2. McLaughlin v. OkumuraAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Sommer v. RhoadsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Lee Baker, Jr. v. Kenneth M. Duffus, Kenneth M. Duffus v. Lee E. Baker, Jr.Alaska Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API