Legal Opinion

Sommer v. Rhoads

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 31, 2006No. 1267, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

In this case, we consider whether a statutory attorney’s lien against a client’s cause of action for work performed before the client’s bankruptcy may survive that bankruptcy, even though the attorney did not give the notices required to assert the lien at the time the bankruptcy was filed. We shall hold that it may.

FACTS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Appellants Fred S. Sommer, an attorney, and Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A., his law firm (collectively referred to in the singular as Sommer), appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of their former client, appellee Lori Denise…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rhoads v. SommerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API