Greene v. a P Products, Ltd
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
In this case we consider the scope of a manufacturer’s or seller’s duty to warn of product risks under MCL 600.2948(2). We conclude that the statute imposes a duty to warn that extends only to material risks not obvious to a reasonably prudent product user, and to material risks that are not, or should not be, a matter of common knowledge to persons in the same or a similar position as the person who suffered the injury in question. Because the material risk associated with ingesting and inhaling Wonder 8 Hair Oil, as occurred here, would have been obvious to a reasonably prudent product…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Latham v. Barton Malow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. NixMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Bahri v. IDS Property Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Certified Question From 14th Dist. Court of Appeals of TexasMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.