Legal Opinion

Greene v. a P Products, Ltd

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 2006No. Docket 127718, 127734PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

In this case we consider the scope of a manufacturer’s or seller’s duty to warn of product risks under MCL 600.2948(2). We conclude that the statute imposes a duty to warn that extends only to material risks not obvious to a reasonably prudent product user, and to material risks that are not, or should not be, a matter of common knowledge to persons in the same or a similar position as the person who suffered the injury in question. Because the material risk associated with ingesting and inhaling Wonder 8 Hair Oil, as occurred here, would have been obvious to a reasonably prudent product…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Latham v. Barton Malow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. NixMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Bahri v. IDS Property Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In Re Certified Question From 14th Dist. Court of Appeals of TexasMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API