Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
In this products liability case, plaintiff appeals from a directed verdict granted in the circuit court and affirmed in the Court of Appeals. She argues that the testimony of her expert witness created a question of fact for the jury. We disagree, and affirm the decision of the trial court, but for reasons different from those of the Court of Appeals.
I
Leave to appeal was granted in order to consider the following questions:
1. Does a manufacturer’s compliance with industry or governmental standards in a products liabil*416ity action preclude the jury from determining whether such conduct was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rutherford v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by145 opinions
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- George BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Y & O PRESS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Desiano v. Warner-Lambert & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.