Legal Opinion

Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1982No. 61965, (Calendar No. 8)PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

In this products liability case, plaintiff appeals from a directed verdict granted in the circuit court and affirmed in the Court of Appeals. She argues that the testimony of her expert witness created a question of fact for the jury. We disagree, and affirm the decision of the trial court, but for reasons different from those of the Court of Appeals.

I

Leave to appeal was granted in order to consider the following questions:

1. Does a manufacturer’s compliance with industry or governmental standards in a products liabil*416ity action preclude the jury from determining whether such conduct was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. George BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Y & O PRESS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Desiano v. Warner-Lambert & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API