Legal Opinion
In re Lucey Mfg. Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 15, 1925No. 379PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). We do not understand that any question is raised of the knowledge by the creditors’ committee that the California business was being conducted as in fact it' was, and that Everett .was to pay and was paying such claims as were necessary to continue it. That knowledge was, moreover, acquired under circumstances which leave no doubt that the receivers’ operations, of which Everett’s were in substance a part, were with the committee’s entire assent. While perhaps they did not know specifically of each payment made, the greater includes the less, and their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simonson v. SinsheimerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Moulton v. CoburnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904
- Utz & Dunn Co. v. Regulator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Ohio Motor Car Co. v. Eiseman Magneto Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Despres v. GalbraithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re ThomasDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
- Fisher v. Bank Leumi Trust Co. of New York (In Re MacFarlane Webster Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- American Woolen Co. v. American Silk Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- In Re Acorn Electric Supply, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1972
- Park Lane Dresses, Inc. v. Houghton & Dutton Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.