Legal Opinion

Moulton v. Coburn

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 6, 1904No. 521PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

The original petition in involuntary bankruptcy was filed by a single creditor. It alleged as the sole act of bankruptcy an assignment for the benefit of creditors, and that there were less than twelve creditors. In fact, there were at the date of filing the petition about thirty creditors. An attempt was made to increase the number of petitioners in accordance with section 59d of the bankruptcy act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 561 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3445]). The District Court held that there were but two proper petitioners, and more than twelve creditors,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Simonson v. SinsheimerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  3. In re ChaseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
  4. In re BedingfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1899
  5. In re CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re Alta Title Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
  2. Myron M. Navison Shoe Co. v. Lane Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1929
  3. In Re Caucus Distributors, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
  4. In re Pettingill & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1905
  5. Utz & Dunn Co. v. Regulator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API