Legal Opinion

Maycroft v. Jennings Farms

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1920No. Docket No. 91PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Vanderwerp (John), J. Case by Charles - Maycroft and another against The Jennings Farms for the unlawful conversion of certain mortgaged personal property. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for the alleged unlawful conversion of certain mortgaged personal property, consisting of 2 horses, 2 cows, 1 stump machine, and 1 double harness, by the foreclosure and sale thereof by defendant before the maturity of the chattel mortgage. The mortgage bore date March 3, 1916, and was due December 31, 1916. It appeared that on or about June 23, 1916, the defendant took possession of the property covered by the mortgage, and after advertising it for sale under the mortgage, sold the same on June 29, 1916, against the protest of the plaintiffs.

T…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Polk's Administrator v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  2. Iler v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hofreiter v. SchwablandWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Tuttle v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Dalton v. LaudahnMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Charles Magley III v. M&W IncorporatedMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. National Discount Corp. v. O'MellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  3. In re StewartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
  4. Ehman v. Libralter Plastics, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Hudson v. EnichenMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API