Moe v. Kuriansky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR articles 23 and 78 to prohibit the respondent from acting beyond his authority and to quash certain Grand Jury subpoenas, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.), dated December 16, 1985, which denied the application.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
*595On this appeal, the petitioner questions the authority of the respondent, the Deputy Attorney-General for Medicaid Fraud Control, to issue the challenged subpoenas. However, the respondent’s power to do so is well settled. Executive Law § 63 (3) "bestow[s] upon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Schumer v. HoltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Landau v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arc Plumbing & Heating Corp. v. Board of Responsibility of the Department of General ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- Kimyagarova v. SpitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Commissioner of Transportation v. V.A.S.T. Resources, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1989
- Doe v. KurianskyNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Cabasso v. HoltzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.