Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cabasso v. Holtzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 25, 1986Published

1Concurrence

Brown, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part and votes to *946modify the order appealed from, and grant the application to quash the subpoena to the extent of permitting the production of the subpoenaed documents by any officer, director, or managing agent of the corporation, and as so modified, thereupon to affirm the order insofar as appealed from, with the following memorandum: It is clear that the petitioner Gemini Speaker Systems, Inc., as a corporate entity, has no 5th Amendment privilege (see, Bellis v United States, 417 US 85, 88; Wilson v United States, 221 US 361; see also, Matter of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Virag v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Matter of Bleakley v. SchlesingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API