Legal Opinion

Kimyagarova v. Spitzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to bar the respondents from proceeding with the trial in an action entitled People v Kimyagarova, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Indictment No. 1914/03, and from disseminating written transcripts and audio recordings of conversations that were intercepted and recorded by the respondent Attorney General, Eliot Spitzer, in relation to its investigation of the petitioners.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Preliminarily, we note that this Court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Doe v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Landau v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Andrew F. Capoccia, L. L. C. v. SpitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Moe v. KurianskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cuomo v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People ex rel. Washington v. BurgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Kisina v. CoopermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API