Legal Opinion

State v. McNamee

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1984No. 1-83-27, -28, -29, -30, -31 and -32PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was charged in the Lima Municipal Court with six different charges of pandering obscenity in violation of R.C. 2907.32. In each case the trial court, prior to trial, on motion of the defendant, dismissed the charges and in each case, the state has appealed.

All six motions to dismiss were heard at the same time. As to case No. 1-83-27, evidence in the form of a magazine entitled “Femme Fatale, Volume 1, No. 2” was introduced into evidence by the defendant on the hearing on the defendant’s motion to dismiss. Each of the charges related to a different specific magazine. Without any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. VarnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. State v. TiptonOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. O'NealOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. HartleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. City of North Olmsted v. BullingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API