Legal Opinion

State v. O'Neal

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1996No. 15354PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kerns, Judge.

The defendant, Walter A. O’Neal, was indicted for the possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11(A), which simply provides that “no person shall knowingly obtain, possess, or use a controlled substance.”

Prior to trial, the parties stipulated that the state’s case was based entirely upon “0.02 gram of a chunky white substance” which was analyzed and found to contain cocaine by the Miami Valley Regional Crime Laboratory.

Subsequently, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the small amount of cocaine found on him was insufficient as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. State v. McNameeOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BradyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. KnoxOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. City of North Olmsted v. BullingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. Serban, 2006 Ca 00198 (7-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API