Legal Opinion

City of North Olmsted v. Bullington

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 2000No. 76224PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patricia Ann Blackmon, Judge.

This appeal raises for the first time in Ohio the question of whether a city may prosecute a domestic violence victim for aiding and abetting an offender in the violation of a temporary protection order (“TPO”) issued for the victim’s protection restraining the offender from contact with the victim. This question comes to us in an appeal by the appellant city of North Olmsted (“city”) after the trial court dismissed the city’s complicity complaint filed by it against appellee Laura Bullington.

The city assigns the following errors for our review:

“I. The trial court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Felton v. FeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Auburn v. HedlundWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. City of Auburn v. HedlundWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. LucasOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. CoburnOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. City of Auburn v. HedlundWashington Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API