Seymour v. Watson
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.
Trespass quare clausum fregit. Plea, not guilty. Verdict and judgment below for the plaintiff. 1
It appeared in evidence, that the plaintiff and defendant were the proprietors of adjoining fields; that the defendant purchased his land of the United'States, and before his lines had been run, and while the plaintiff’s land was vacant, enclosed his field with a rail-fence made with his own rails, and that in doing so, he placed a part of the fence on the land of the United States, which the plaintiff afterwards purchased; and that the defendant moved the fence from the land of the plaintiff to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by12 opinions
- Bowen v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Bass Foundry & Machine Works v. GallentineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Dutton v. EnsleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Hamilton v. HuntleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.