Legal Opinion

Application of Feight

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 3, 1950No. Patent Appeal 5675PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Priinary Examiner in his requirement for division between (I) claims 2 and 3 and (II) claims 8-12, 18, and 19 in appellant’s application for a patent on a rotary garbage grinder. Claims 2 and 3 are directed to a one-piece grinder housing, and the claims of the second group are drawn to a one-piece grinder rotor.

'The remaining claims of the application, Nos. 1, 4-7, and 13-17, were rejected as drawn to an old combination of a housing and a grinder rotor.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Steinmetz v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. In re FreemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  3. In Re PedersenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  4. In re TrierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Application of Leo L. HengeholdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. In Re LarkinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API