Legal Opinion

In Re Pedersen

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 10, 1934No. Patent Appeal 3355PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States. Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Examiner, requiring division between claims 1 to 6, inclusive, of appellant’s application, which are drawn to a cigar enveloping machine, and claims 12 to 18, inclusive, which are drawn in part to a process of enveloping a cigar, and in part to the cigar envelope as formed by the process.

Claim 1 is illustrative of the allowed claims, and reads as follows: “(1) In a cigar enveloping machine, the combination with a support for a cigar encircled by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Steinmetz v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Bennet v. FowlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. In Re ButlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. In Re RundellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  5. In Re HawkinsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of FeightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  2. Varian v. LlewellynCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Varian v. LlewellynCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API