State v. Graf
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] ReAnna Graf and Samuel Pari-sién appeal from convictions for drug-related offenses entered after they conditionally pled guilty to the charges. We conclude Parisien’s consent to a search of his apartment after consultation with an attorney purged the taint of law enforcement’s unlawful entry into the apartment. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On February 22, 2005, the manager of a Grand Forks apartment complex called a law enforcement officer to report her suspicions of drug activity in one of the apartments she managed. After speaking with the apartment manager, four officers went…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. SchmalzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. GoebelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GoebelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SkarsgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.