Legal Opinion

State v. Graf

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2006No. 20050410-20050413, 20050414-20050417PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] ReAnna Graf and Samuel Pari-sién appeal from convictions for drug-related offenses entered after they conditionally pled guilty to the charges. We conclude Parisien’s consent to a search of his apartment after consultation with an attorney purged the taint of law enforcement’s unlawful entry into the apartment. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On February 22, 2005, the manager of a Grand Forks apartment complex called a law enforcement officer to report her suspicions of drug activity in one of the apartments she managed. After speaking with the apartment manager, four officers went…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. SchmalzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. GoebelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. GoebelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. SkarsgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API