Legal Opinion

State v. Goebel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2007No. 20060147PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Brian Q. Goebel appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of gross sexual imposition. Goebel argues that the district court erroneously denied his motion to suppress incriminating statements, that the charges were time barred by the statute of limitations, and that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In June 2005, Goebel was charged with gross sexual imposition under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-03(2)(a) for allegedly having sexual contact with his nephew and his niece, J.G. and D.G., when…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. State v. WoinarowiczNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. GrafNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. State v. SchmalzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. GoebelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. AlbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. PaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API