Dobson v. Wolff
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
This is an action brought by Lela M. Dobson to recover from defendants a commission for the sale of a farm. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence defendants moved for a directed verdict on the ground that the evidence was not sufficient to entitle plaintiff to recover and this motion was granted. From judgment entered pursuant to the directed verdict, plaintiff has appealed.
The controversy arose out of an oral arrangement between plaintiff who conducted a real estate agency in Sioux Falls and Alice H. Wolff, defendant owner of a farm in Turner county. Plaintiff was told that she could try…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Langford v. IssenhuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Vreeland v. VetterleinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1869
- Carney v. John Hancock Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Ericson v. EbsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Neff v. World Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Larson v. SyversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Reed v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Mehlberg v. RedlinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.