Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Burrus
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.
The sole question for us to determine is whether or not the doctrine of election is applicable to the facts in this case.
The doctrine of election is based upon the principle that a devisee or donee cannot take benefits under a will and reject its adverse provisions. Lamb v. Lamb, 226 N.C. 662, 40 S.E. 2d 29. The beneficiary under a will is not required to elect unless two benefits are presented which are inconsistent with each other. And when the beneficiary chooses to accept one of them such choice is tantamount to a rejection of the other. He will not be permitted to take under the will and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Elmore v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Benton v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Byrd v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Lamb v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Hoggard v. Jordan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Olive v. BiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Sandlin v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.