Legal Opinion

Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in Gastonia

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1955No. 164PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The ultimate questions for decision are these: 1. Did the plaintiff own all or any part of the property in controversy as of the date of her husband’s death? 2. If so, is she precluded from asserting her claims against defendants, based on such ownership, by her acceptance of benefits under her husband’s will?

A deed to husband and wife, nothing else appearing, vests the title in them as tenants by entirety. Byrd v. Patterson, 229 N.C. 156, 48 S.E. 2d 45, and cases cited. The fact that the husband paid the entire purchase price, standing alone, does not affect the character of the estate…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. R. S. Pullen v. the Commissioners of Wake County.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  3. Alexander v. . JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Elmore v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Best v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Huss v. HussCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Waddell v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Godwin v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Ramsey v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Greer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API