Benton v. . Alexander
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
While decided differently in many jurisdictions, it is settled law in this State that, nothing else appearing, a beneficiary under a will, wbo is under tbe necessity of making an election, bas exercised tbat privilege by offering tbe will as executor and procuring its probate. Mendenhall v. Mendenhall, 53 N. C., 287; Tripp v. Nobles, 136 N. C., 99, 48 S. E., 675; Elmore v. Byrd, 180 N. C., 120, 104 S. E., 162; Syme v. Badger, 92 N. C., 706.
Tbe question presented bere is whether tbe plaintiff in tbis action was put to ber election under tbe terms of ber husband’s will. Bearing upon tbe issues…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Elmore v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- McGehee v. . McGeheeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Syme v. . BadgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Mendenhall v. . MendenhallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1860
- Tripp v. Nobles.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Byrd v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Lamb v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.