Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Meyers

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 24, 1971No. 394-2PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

This appeal involves the scope of the duty imposed upon a notary public to ascertain the identity of a person seeking the notary’s certificate on a deed.

The appellant, Genny A. Tenny, was a duly commissioned notary public who took an acknowledgment on a quitclaim deed. The signature of the grantor was forged by the grantee and the deed was used to clear title in the grantee, who subsequently conveyed the property by war ranty deed to a purchaser. The true owner of the property (the named grantors on the quitclaim deed) succeeded in upsetting the sale by an action to quiet title. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matsko v. DallyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Amsden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Kangley v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Chilberg v. ParsonsWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Clapp v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Meyers v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Breimon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Nelson v. ComerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Breimon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API