Lee James, Inc. v. Carr

— -Plaintiff, in an amended complaint, set forth its cause of action. Omitting the prayer and the first paragraph thereof, in which paragraph were allegations setting forth the relationship of the parties, the amended complaint contained the following allegations :

“(2) That during all times herein mentioned said defendant, H. W. Carr, was a duly appointed, qualified and acting notary public under the laws of the state of Washington; that said defendant, Globe Indemnity Company, for value, became surety upon the bond of its co-defendant as such notary in the sum of $1,000, conditioned that…